News » Politics

Newt Gingrich Accepts ’Reality’ of Same-Sex Marriage

by Jason St. Amand
National News Editor
Monday Dec 24, 2012

In an interview with the Huffington Post, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said that he can accept the reality of marriage equality and acknowledges that more Americans are coming to terms with same-sex marriage.

The Republican candidate for the 2012 presidential nomination told HuffPo that he believes marriage should be defined as a union between one man and one woman but that the party and himself should accept a distinction between a "marriage in a church from a legal document issued by the state."

"I think that this will be much more difficult than immigration for conservatism to come to grips with," Gingrich told the website. "It is in every family. It is in every community. The momentum is clearly now in the direction in finding some way to ... accommodate and deal with reality. And the reality is going to be that in a number of American states -- and it will be more after 2014 -- gay relationships will be legal, period."

Gingrich, along with the rest of America, witnessed the LGBT rights movement make historic strides in November. After Mitt Romney lost the presidential election and President Barack Obama, who supports marriage equality, was re-elected, voters in Washington, Maryland and Maine approved measures to legalize gay marriage. Additionally, a number of out politicians were elected into office, including Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, who became the first out-gay U.S. senator.

Gingrich, who has long been a national leader of his party's right wing, also commented on how changes in the electorate's opinions will affect the federal Defense of Marriage Act. A challenge to DOMA is currently on the Supreme Court's docket.

"I didn't think that was inevitable 10 or 15 years ago, when we passed the Defense of Marriage Act," he said. "It didn't seem at the time to be anything like as big a wave of change as we are now seeing."

The article points out Gingrich's personal connections to the issue. His out half-sister, Candace Gingrich-Jones, works for the Human Rights Campaign. Gingrich told the Huffington Post that he has gay friends who tied the knot in Iowa.

Several gay rights organizations commented on Gingrich's remarks, including the HRC's president, Chad Griffin.

"Newt Gingrich has proven that leaders in the Republican party understand where the country is moving on marriage but he is also brave enough to say it out loud," Griffin told BuzzFeed. "It's remarkable that Gingrich admits he didn't see the coming power of the LGBT community and our allies back in 1996 but now understands the wave of change that's sweeping over the nation." Griffin added Gingrich's comments "give room for other Republican leaders to reflect on the direction in which the country is heading and get on the right side of history."

For her part, Gingrich-Jones said she was "proud of my brother." She also believes that the time she and her wife spent with Gingrich impacted his stance on the controversial social issue.

"The time my wife Rebecca and I have spent with Newt has had an effect and he has evolved on marriage," she said. "I know this was just one interview and I don't imagine he'll be Googling PFLAG anytime soon ( in case you do, Newt), but it is most definitely progress."

The Log Cabin Republicans lauded Gingrich for his acceptance of marriage equality.

"Log Cabin Republicans welcome former Speaker Newt Gingrich's remarks calling for a Republican reality check on marriage," R. Clark Cooper, Log Cabin's president, said in a statement. "Gingrich speaks for many Republicans who are concerned about our party's future, and who are ready to accept the freedom to marry matters to many Americans, gay and straight. As Gingrich noted, LGBT people are part of every family and every community, and the time has come for greater inclusion. It is particularly important and welcome to hear that Gingrich now understands the difference between church ceremonies and a civil marriage license, and that equality is no threat to religious freedom."

When the news hit the ultra-conservative website Free Republic, the site's readers strongly reacted to Gingrich's views on marriage equality. Predictably, they were angry and expressed betrayal.

"Real conservatives don't and won't accept it," one reader wrote. "Fake conservatives like Newton do accept it." Another person wrote, "I don't have to accept anything. I may have to live with it, but I don't have to accept it."

"Just another 'bandwagon' Conservative. He deems himself Conservative only when there is political benefit for him and the rest of his RINOs on the bandwagon," a reader said.

Earlier this year, the Associated Press reported that Gingrich approved taking the issue before voters in Washington State. "I think at least they're doing it the right way, which is going through voters, giving them a chance to vote and not having a handful of judges arbitrarily impose their will," Gingrich said.


  • Michelle, 2012-12-24 10:43:39

    Even though he is a Republican, I now have a ton more respect for Newt. People don’t have to agree or even like us, but that does not give them the right to deny us our civil rights that are given to everybody else.

  • sjenner, 2012-12-24 22:33:29

    Gingrich has always been a bit of an opportunist and politically more pragmatic than most have either realized or cared to credit. Love them or hate them, most successful politicians are like this. With any luck Gingich’s move will open the GOP to a more accepting position on LGBT issues. The Party has already shown some trending in that direction. So perhaps this move will give momentum and seal the end of bigotry and zealotry as legitimate platforms in our national, political discourse.

  • Oh Jed said:, 2012-12-25 13:50:05

    It’s mighty white of you Newt...finally accepting something you realize you have no control over and have no persuasive power to change or stop. Candace may respect you, but I think you’re still a cock sucker (and I don’t mean that in a complimentart way).

  • WayGay, 2012-12-26 11:14:27

    He’s a whore plain and simple. He will say anything as long as it makes him $$$. Marriage is a joke to him anyway. Look at the string of affairs under his belt.

  • Marc , 2012-12-26 23:24:23

    Hes not doing anything that Obama didn’t do. Do you forget Obama told Rick Warren in ’08 that marriage is between one man and woman? Obama didn’t become pro marriage equality until the political reality in his base in an election year forced him to "evolve".

  • Wayne M., 2012-12-27 15:21:33

    It is notable that this Georgian Salamander did not speak out when he was running for President, nor was he very supportive of equality when he was Speaker of the House. Too bad Newt, but talk is cheap.

  • , 2013-01-20 23:19:39

    I am a born again christian, and I will not accept it. It is against my religious beliefs and I do not have to accept it, and to try to tell me I have to is to say that I can not hold on to my religious freedom.

  • Wayne M., 2013-01-21 09:22:55

    To anonymous: If marriage equality is against your religious beliefs, you have the religious freedom to not marry a person of the same sex. What you do not have is a religious freedom to deny this right to others or to deny the right to Christian denominations who do support marriage equality to marry same-sex couples. Please note that I am also a born-again Christian, but I do not use scriptures out of historic and scientific context as an excuse for discrimination or bigotry.

  • sjenner, 2013-01-21 11:21:42

    Anonymous, no one is asking you accept gay marriage. The point is that you have no right to abuse the organs of government to determine what is and is not an "acceptable marriage" between two consenting adults. If every religious argument were to be given validity over who can and cannot marry, then mixed race marriages would also be illegal, along with mixed religion marriages and Lord knows what else. The point is that the First Amendment prohibits government from establishing a religion, which includes codifying religious doctrines and dogmas as law. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments require equality before the law, under the law. Put that together, and the right of government to deny fundamental equality to all citizens and persons within the United States become quite suspect and constitutionally vulnerable.

  • Marc , 2013-01-22 12:30:08

    Wayne M. Gingrich didn’t support marriage equality when he was Speaker and neither did most Democrats or Bill Clinton. Gingrich however has never been outspoken ant-gay like his Democrat colleague Sen. Sam Nunn who wrote DADT was throughout his career. And, Gingrich in the 80’s supported sanctions against Apartheid SA when most Republicans fir not.

Add New Comment

Comments on Facebook