News » National

FRC’s Tony Perkins Calls Oregon Ruling ’Another Lawless Decision’

Monday May 19, 2014

Following Monday's decision by U.S. District Court Judge Michael McShane striking down Oregon's ban on same-sex marriage, saying the law was unconstitutional, Tony Perkins, president of anti-gay hate group Family Research Council released the following statement:

"This is another lawless decision that the Supreme Court has not provided any precedent for. The Supreme Court has said nothing that would give a federal judge the right to redefine marriage. In fact, the Supreme Court has granted stays in comparable cases which this judge failed to do.

"The judge's disregard for the rule of law and for the voters of Oregon is breathtaking. The state's failure to defend its own constitution, and the failure of an openly homosexual judge to recuse himself, demonstrate that this decision is without basis.

"If the courts believe they are going to resolve this issue once and for all by forcing a redefinition of marriage on the American people, they are wrong. The far reaching decision in Roe v. Wade was intended to resolve the issue of abortion, which 41 years later we know conclusively it did not. The definition of marriage, like the sanctity of human life, is seen in the natural or moral law. The decisions of courts can ignore it, they can even attempt to suppress it, but they will never eradicate it," concluded Perkins.

As previously reported by the Associated Press, State officials have said they'd be prepared to carry out same-sex marriages almost immediately, and couples lined up outside the county clerk's office in Portland in anticipation of the decision.

State officials refused to defend the ban, and McShane earlier denied a request by the National Organization for Marriage to intervene on behalf of its Oregon members.


  • Wayne M., 2014-05-19 17:35:45

    Tony Perkins and his allies need to get over it. The fact is that they not only are fighting against recognition of the human, civil and equality rights of LGBT people, but they are fighting against religious freedom rather than defending it. Not every religion and certainly not every Christian or Christian denomination shares their narrow-mindedness or appreciates them forcing their religious dogmas on others.

  • , 2014-05-19 18:52:58

    Actually the law denying marriage was lawless. Ha ha eat it

  • Charlie, 2014-05-19 21:42:33

    So a gay man cannot participate in issues over gay marriage, but it’s still okay for an overtly Christian, antigay, married man who believes in a certain interpretation of the Bible that prohibit homosexuality to preside over cases involving marriage? Nah. If we can’t preside over this, they can’t either.

  • patroy, 2014-05-20 13:04:22

    It’s a shame this idiots breath wasn’t literally taken away ! One less moron in the world would be nice!

Add New Comment

Comments on Facebook