News » News

Retired general: Gays made Dutch weak in Bosnia

by Pauline Jelinek
Friday Mar 19, 2010

A retired U.S. general says Dutch troops failed to defend against the 1995 genocide in the Bosnian war because the army was weakened, partly because it included openly gay soldiers.

The comment by John Sheehan, a former NATO commander who retired from the military in 1997, shocked some at a Senate Armed Services Committee, where Sheehan spoke in opposition to a proposal to allow gays to serve openly in the U.S. military. Committee Chairman Sen. Carl Levin told Sheehan he was "totally off-target."

A Dutch defense ministry spokesman dismissed Sheehan's remarks as nonsense. Britain, Canada, Australia and Israel as well as the Netherlands allow gays to serve openly.

Sheehan said European militaries deteriorated after the collapse of the Soviet Union and focused on peacekeeping because "they did not believe the Germans were going to attack again or the Soviets were coming back."

Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and other nations believed there was no longer a need for an active combat capability in the militaries, he said. "They declared a peace dividend and made a conscious effort to socialize their military - that includes the unionization of their militaries, it includes open homosexuality."

Dutch troops serving as U.N. peacekeepers and tasked with defending the town of Srebrenica in 1995 were an example of a force that became ill-equipped for war.

"The battalion was understrength, poorly led, and the Serbs came into town, handcuffed the soldiers to the telephone poles, marched the Muslims off, and executed them," Sheehan said.

"That was the largest massacre in Europe since World War II," he said of the killing of some 8,000 Bosnian Muslim boys and men after Serbian forces captured the town.

Levin, D-Mich., appeared incredulous. "Did the Dutch leaders tell you it (the fall of Srebrenica) was because there were gay soldiers there?" he asked.

"Yes," Sheehan said. "They included that as part of the problem." He said the former chief of staff of the Dutch army had told him.

Levin said it may be the case that some militaries have focused on peacekeeping to the detriment of their war-fighting skills.

"But I think that any effort to connect that failure on the part of the Dutch to the fact that they have homosexuals, or did allow homosexuals, I think is totally off-target," said Levin, a proponent of ending restrictions on gays serving in the U.S. armed forces.

"The Dutch military, as you point out, were peacekeepers and not peace-enforcers. I agree with that," said Levin. "But what the heck that has to do with the issue before us is what mystifies me."

Dutch defense ministry spokesman Roger Van de Wetering said in a telephone interview that he finds it "unbelievable that a man of this rank is stating this nonsense."

"The whole operation in Srebrenica and the drama that took place over there was thoroughly investigated by Dutch and international authorities and none of these investigations has ever concluded or suggested a link between homosexual military personnel and the things that happened over there. I do not know on what facts this is based, but for us it is total nonsense," Van de Wetering said.

On the Dutch attitude to gays in the military, he said: "For us it is very simple. Every man or woman that meets the criteria physically and mentally is welcome to serve in our armed forces regardless of (religious) belief, sexual preference or whatever."

Copyright Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


  • BB, 2010-03-19 12:47:21

    Really stupid comment. What’s the proof? Exactly - NOTHING. Just a lot of crap by some clown who hasn’t been active duty for 15 years. Next.

  • me, 2010-03-19 12:49:13

    Score one for the anti-DADT. That general is an idiot!

  • , 2010-03-20 13:59:13

    Like the nut who blamed the 911 events that brought down the World Trade Center on the gays of New York City, this idiot is blaming a military debacle upon gays, when it should be blamed upon strategy gone awry. Since this homophobe is voicing his opinion with a closed mind, he ought to keep his mouth shut as well.

  • Rich, 2010-03-21 00:44:06

    Just another idiot speaking out his $@?

  • fernsky, 2010-03-22 18:58:30

    There were 10 Belgian paratroopers who according to U.N. regulations surrendered their weapons to the Hutu military in Rwanda. They were not supposed to fight so they gave up their weapons and they were all shot after that, this happened at the time of the Rwandan genocide, they could witness it but not intervene. They were gay that’s for sure, but I’m not sure their wives would have agreed they sued the state and I don’t know the outcome. BTW have you noticed all the ribbons on his chest he must have been on the front line since Julius Cesar to own that many, "Chesty" Puller only owned five.

  • fernsky, 2010-03-22 20:09:20

    Addendum. Whomever says anything against gays on the battle field doesn’t know anything about a battlefield. Gen. Puller also said the problem with the military was the typing machines and not enough ammunition. They are putting this marine on trial for the Haditha (VietRaq) killing, he was a SGT, why punish him, same for Abu Grahib torturing, these people were doing what they thought was their duty, the one responsible for all that was Bush, same for Lt Calley, they should have gone after Johnson. I do not like the military but all my love goes to those who’ve been in combat situation, I know what it is to be threatened with a gun, it goes through your guts and brain, it is so powerful that your conscious brain is not in charge anymore you just act or re-act, these guy are there everyday knowing the next one they may go up in smoke (I’m not quoting Cheech & Chong movie). Let the gay join the military freely if that is what they wanna do but they should be able to claim a spouse to claim what little benefits the heteros are getting.

Add New Comment

Comments on Facebook